Equipping God's People to Create Missional Culture

Divided by Hell? An Assessment of “Love Wins” by Rob Bell: Heresy, Orthodoxy & Final Judgment – Part II

If you haven’t read the introduction to this six-part series, you can read that here. Before we look at the questions: What is universalism and is Rob Bell a universalist? And Does God’s love and mercy extend beyond the grave, here is an overview of the entire book.

Overview of Love Wins

In Love Wins, Bell teaches that God’s love is universal in scope and reach and that the central truth of Christian life is about a transformative faith – it’s about joining God in the renewal of all things both in this age and the next, as opposed to a transactional faith – where one prays a prayer in order to go to heaven in another time and another place. For Bell, heaven and hell are both present realities and future realities.

Throughout the book, Bell consistently seeks to answer the questions: Is the good news that Jesus came to preach concerned with getting a ticket to heaven in order to escape hell? Or is it more about an invitation to partner with God to bring a greater taste of heaven to earth?

To accomplish this, he first seeks to subvert the common notion that salvation is simply a set of objective facts for an individual to “believe.” Rather, it is an invitation to switch stories and join God in “dragging the future into the present”. When talking about heaven, he follows the path of N.T. Wright and others. He holds to a redeemed earth, where heaven and earth become one and things are done on earth as they are in heaven. Bell believes that our eschatology shapes our ethics and that Jesus is more “interested in our hearts being transformed, so that we can actually handle heaven” rather than focusing on who “gets in” or how “to get in.” For when Jesus speaks of judgment, it often involves surprises. Thus he warns “us against rash judgments about who’s in and who’s out” (54).

From heaven, Bell moves to hell. He mentions that the Hebrew Scriptures are vague regarding what happens after a person dies, and then he does a quick sweep through every verse in the Bible in which “hell” is used. He sums up Jesus’ teaching on hell saying it is “a volatile mixture of images, pictures and metaphors that describe the very real experiences and consequences of rejecting our God-give goodness and humanity. Something we are all free to do, anytime, anywhere, with anyone” (73).
For Bell, “There are individual hells, and communal, society-wide hells, and Jesus teaches us to take both seriously. There is hell now, and there is hell later, and Jesus teaches us to take both seriously” (79). He points out that when Jesus talked about hell, he was addressing the covenant people who were straying from the God-given calling. He was not speaking of hell as the means of compelling the “heathen” and “pagans” to come in. He ends his chapter on hell by reminding us that “God crushes, refines, tests, corrects, chastens, and rebukes – but always with a purpose (86)… of healing, redemption, [and] love” (87,88).

After a review of hell, Bell makes the case that God’s love is universal in scope and reach and then he poses two questions. The primary question is, “Does God get what he wants?” In other words, is God great enough and powerful enough to reconcile the whole world to himself? The second question is “Do we get what we want?” In other words, can we choose hell? He says, yes, love wins, because love “can’t be forced, manipulated, or coerced. It always leaves room for the other to decide. God says yes, we can have what we want, because love wins” (119).

Bell then calls us to join Jesus in his way of life by losing our life so that we might find it. He focuses on the victory of the cross and the many ways that Christians have understood atonement. He describes the good news as both cosmic and personal and cautions against a reductionist gospel whose chief message is the avoidance of hell .

After talking about the cross, he proclaims that Jesus is bigger than any one religion and that while the door is as “narrow as himself” it is “as wide as the universe” (155), thus calling us to be “extremely careful about making negative, decisive, lasting judgments about people’s destinies” (160).

He uses the parable of the prodigal son to question our view of God, saying that “Hell is refusing to trust, and refusing to trust is often rooted in a distorted view of God” (175). He makes the case that, when the gospel is primarily understood as an entrance into heaven rather than participating in God’s life now and forever, it is a reductionist view of the good news that leads to shriveled living. He questions a God who would love and accept someone one minute, and because of death, torment them in hell the next. He thinks the good news is better than that.

In his final chapter, Bell says that the end is here. He shares his personal conversion story, and then makes a passionate plea for people to choose this God of love by dying to the old life and living a new life. He calls us to live today as if it were our last day because time does not repeat itself and our choices matter. He calls us to choose love, because love wins.

Two Significant Flash Points

Having looked at an overview of Love Wins, in the next post, I will focus in on two significant flashpoints that arise from Bell’s teaching.  In this next post, I look at:  What is a universalist and is Rob Bell a universalist?

4 Responses to Divided by Hell? An Assessment of “Love Wins” by Rob Bell: Heresy, Orthodoxy & Final Judgment – Part II

  1. Pingback: Dream Awakener » Divided by Hell? An Assessment of “Love Wins” by Rob Bell: Heresy, Orthodoxy & Final Judgment – Part I

  2. “After talking about the cross, he proclaims that Jesus is bigger than any one religion…”. I’m wondering if you could flesh this one out a bit more (as it was the smallest paragraph in the overview). Great series so far. Thanks!

  3. JR Woodward says:


    Good question. At first, this was going to be the other larger question that I addressed, in addition to the other two and that is: Does God’s love and mercy extend beyond the church? That is essentially what we was addressing in chapter 6, “The Rocks Are Everywhere”. I’m thinking that Rob’s thinking moves along similar lines as Clark Pinnock in “A Wideness in God’s Mercy: The Finality of Jesus Christ in a World of Religions.”

    Here is what Rob’s understanding of John 14:6 “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” He says, “this is as wide and expansive a claim as a person can make.”

    “What he doesn’t say is how, or when, or in what manner the mechanism functions that gets people to God through him. He doesn’t even state that those coming to the Father through him will even know that they were coming exclusively through him. He simply claims that whatever God is doing in the world to know and redeem and love and restore the world is happening through him.”

    “And so the passage is exclusive, deeply so, insisting on Jesus alone as the way to God. But it is an exclusivity on the other side of inclusivity.”

    He then seeks to flesh this out a little more.

    “First, there is exclusivity. Jesus is the only way. Everybody who doesn’t believe in him and follow him in the precise way that is defined by the group doing the defining isn’t saved, redeemed, going to heaven and so on. Tehre is that kind of exlusion. You’re either in, or you’re going to hell. Two groups.”

    “Then there is inclusivity. The kind that is open to all religions, the kind that trusts that good people will get i, that there is only one mountain, but it has many paths. This inclusivity assumes that as your heart is find or your actions measure up, you’ll be okay.”

    Neither of those position satisfy Bell. So he proposes:

    “And then there is an exclusivity on the other side of inclusivity. This kind insists that Jesus is the way, but holds tightly to the assumption that the all-embracing, saving love of this particular Jesus the Christ will of course include all sorts of unexpected people from across the cultural spectrum.”

    That is probably the heart of what he is saying.

  4. Pingback: Jim Pace » A reflective and historically balanced assessment of Rob Bell’s newest book, Love Wins… Part Two… » author of the book Should We Fire God

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.